I had a gentleman comment on my book, the Covenant of Betrothal. His blog is called ‘Old Testament Studies’ blog and someone sent him
a link to my book. He had some interesting things to say, things that were rather
intelligent. Unfortunately, he seems not to have actually read my book. Many of
the ‘objections’ that he raised were actually things I had dealt with, in a way
he would approve of.
It would probably be boring to deal with the entire post, so
much of which would make sense if it was actually written about someone who
believed the things he accused me of. But, for now, I will just deal with his
first point. He writes:
I only looked at the first three arguments: the argument from Rebekah and Isaac; the notion that this was meant to contrast with Jacob and Rachel; and the idea that Genesis 2 is antithetical to young people choosing their spouse.
Now, this is fascinating for two reasons. First of all, I am
fascinated to find out that the first seventeen pages of my book, the entire
first chapter, the one that lays out the whole reason and method for the rest
of the book… contains no arguments. The way I counted it there seemed to be
dozens of arguments per page. So, I ‘m not at all sure how he figures that the arguments
he mentions are the ‘first three’.
The second fascinating thing is that the three things he
mentions are not, actually, arguments in my book. Of course, if he had actually
read the first part of the book (or the rest of it) he might have understood
this.
What he doesn’t understand was what my entire book is all
about. The point and goal of my book is to try to determine how God would have
us get married (or, for fathers like myself, how our children should marry). My
operating assumption is that Scripture does, actually, speak to that.
So what I did, what I do, is take the various proposals:
dating, courtship, and betrothal. More specifically, I examine the various
principles behind these methods.
Dating and courtship, for example, have a basic principle,
expressed variously but basically, “No one should get married without first
going through a period of friendship, getting to know each other, and the like.”
Now, does the story of Adam and Eve support, or deny, that
thesis? Did the first marriage, which God Himself arranged (pun intended) involve
a ‘period of friendship’, where Adam and Eve ‘got to know each other’? Was it
only after that period that Adam finally got down on one knee and asked Eve to
be his wife?
Another principle favored by the dating and courtship crowd
is “It must be the child themselves that picks their spouse, and initiates the process.”
Does the story of Isaac (where his father sent a servant for a wife for Isaac)
or even the story of Jacob (where his father commanded him to take a wife from the
daughters of Laban) support or refute that thesis? Does Scripture show these
two men rejecting their father’s choice? With God’s encouragement, of course?
As the beginning of my book makes clear, our goal was to go
through the entire Word of God to see what the law, teaching, and examples has
to say. And what they have to say, over and over again, is not dating, and not
courtship. Principle after principle of courtship and dating are consistently
refuted; principle after principle of what we call ‘The Covenant of Betrothal’
are consistently affirmed.


0 comments:
Post a Comment